• 08/15/2026
  • Countries / Market Report

Where the US Packaging Market Is Heading

The US packaging market continues to grow, while requirements for sustainability, recyclability and material efficiency are also increasing. Different state-level regulations and an unpredictable tariff policy are adding to the pressure on manufacturers and brands to adapt.

Written by Alexander  Stark

Pin of the US flag on orange background
The US packaging market is caught between growth and increasing pressure to adapt: e-commerce and pharmaceuticals are driving demand, while recycling, EPR and state-level regulation create new requirements.

The US packaging market is one of the largest in the world; only China has a higher consumption of plastic packaging. Market observers expect continued growth over the coming years. Key drivers include e-commerce and the increasing focus on material efficiency and recyclability. Flexible packaging is benefiting in particular: it requires comparatively little material, is lightweight and offers advantages in transport and logistics. Overall, plastic packaging as well as paper and board remain the most important material groups. Alternative and bio-based materials are gaining importance, but so far mainly as niche solutions.

 

Plastic, Paper and Metal Shape the Material Structure

Current market studies by Mordor Intelligence and Fortune Business value the US packaging market at around $270 billion in 2025. They expect annual growth of around 4 percent over the coming years.

In terms of materials, plastic packaging accounted for 35.9 percent of the market by value in 2025, according to Mordor Intelligence. For paper and board, the market researchers forecast annual growth of 5.33 percent through to 2031. According to the study, fibre-based packaging could replace some plastic volumes as retailers increasingly adopt such alternatives. Mordor Intelligence puts the market share of paper and board products at 28.70 percent — however, the figures cannot be directly compared with the 35.88 per cent share for plastic because the material groups are classified differently. Metal packaging also remains in demand. Metal products are expected to achieve an annual growth rate of 6.64 percent through to 2031. Key applications include beverage cans.

Beyond the choice of material, however, demand in individual end-use markets will largely determine where packaging manufacturers can achieve future growth.

 

E-commerce, Food and Pharmaceuticals as Key Growth Drivers

Food has a particularly strong influence on demand: according to Fortune Business Insights, food is the largest end-use segment of the US packaging market. The study forecasts a CAGR of 4.42 percent for the food sector through to 2032. Demand is being driven, among other factors, by the importance of food retail, changing consumer habits and the growth of online grocery shopping and meal-kit services.

Pharmaceutical packaging is one of the more dynamic segments of the US packaging market. Grand View Research values the US market at around $46.4 billion in 2024 and expects it to grow to almost $70.9 billion by 2030. Growth is being driven by the expansion of the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries, as well as increasing requirements for safety, traceability and specialised drug-delivery systems.

As the pharmaceutical market grows, so does demand for specialised packaging services. According to Grand View Research, the US market for such services is expected to grow by around 9 percent annually between 2025 and 2030. In addition to the expansion of the pharmaceutical industry, the packaging sector is benefiting from requirements relating to serialisation and anti-counterfeiting.

Alongside these sector-specific growth drivers, one overarching issue is reshaping almost every packaging segment: sustainability.

 

Sustainability Matters, but Is Not the Only Factor

Sustainability and the circular economy are also among the key development trends in the US packaging market. The focus is on the use of recycled materials, improved recyclability, material reduction and lower emissions. Packaging manufacturers and brands are working on mono-material structures, paper- and fibre-based solutions, lighter packaging, and refill and reuse concepts.

There are also efforts at national level to improve recycling structures. The National Recycling Strategy, published by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2021, supports the goal of increasing the recycling rate for municipal solid waste from around 32 percent at the time to 50 percent by 2030. The strategy focuses on five areas: strengthening markets for recycled materials, expanding collection and recycling infrastructure, reducing contamination in recycling streams, improving policy frameworks for the circular economy, and standardising measurement methods.

However, structural barriers continue to hinder the development of a more circular packaging economy, including fragmented collection and recycling systems.

Consumer behaviour also reveals conflicting priorities. A McKinsey survey of 1,000 US consumers conducted in March 2025 shows that sustainability is relevant when it comes to packaging, but ranks behind price, quality and convenience. More than 70 percent of respondents consider price and quality important purchasing criteria, while the environmental impact of packaging is extremely or very important to 44 percent. Food safety and shelf life rank particularly highly among packaging attributes.

US consumers see brand owners (36 percent) and packaging manufacturers (32 percent) as having the greatest responsibility for making packaging more sustainable. For the market, this means that sustainability is becoming more important, but must be reconciled with product protection, convenience and cost.

Recyclability, in particular, is likely to become increasingly important as EPR and recycling requirements continue to expand.

 

50 States with Their Own Regulatory Frameworks

A defining feature of the US packaging market is its pronounced heterogeneity. The 50 states differ significantly in terms of packaging applications, consumer habits, recycling infrastructure and regulatory requirements. There is no nationally harmonised set of statistics on packaging recycling, and states also collect data using different methodologies in some cases. The conditions for collection and recycling likewise vary considerably from one region to another.

New EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility) regulations in seven states are increasing pressure on brands and packaging manufacturers to adapt material selection, recyclability and packaging design more closely to regional requirements. Maine, Oregon, Colorado, California, Minnesota, Maryland and Washington have now adopted packaging EPR legislation, although implementation is at different stages. California is particularly important: as the most populous US state, it is one of the key individual markets for brands and packaging manufacturers. Its requirements could therefore influence packaging design and material choices beyond the state itself for companies operating nationwide. Compliance requirements are thus increasingly becoming economic factors.

Large, integrated suppliers can generally absorb regulatory requirements and the associated costs more effectively thanks to economies of scale and extensive research and development capabilities. Smaller companies, by contrast, are increasingly looking for opportunities to differentiate themselves and specialise.

The tariff policy of the current US administration is adding further pressure to adapt. Changing trading conditions are increasing costs and prompting packaging manufacturers and brands to review their supply chains, diversify sourcing and adjust packaging in terms of material use and dimensions. Continued uncertainty over trade policy is also making long-term investment and procurement decisions more difficult.

The future development of the US packaging market will therefore depend to a significant extent on how effectively companies respond to regional regulation, changing supply chains and growing demand for material-efficient packaging solutions.

Author

Alexander Stark
Alexander  Stark
Editor FACHPACK360°